Category Archives: Business

Service Catalogue Options

A Service Catalogue can be a structured (Word / Excel) document located in a Sharepoint folder accessible from any location.  This option provides a way of documenting specific requirements.

Alternatively Webpages and Web-Forms can be created which are available via the Intranet.  However most organisations will jump to the COTS solution.  Here are a few vendors:

ServiceNow has doubled their annual contract values Year on Year for the last five years.   Their service portfolio management solution transforms IT-speak into a language the business understands and cares about. They call it the language of IT 3.0. 

CA Service Catalog helps you increase value by communicating service offerings in rich, descriptive business language

CA Oblicore Guarantee (TM) accelerates the monitoring, reporting, and management of the service portfolio

Axios – to assist with the rapid deployment of the service catalog Axios provides a complete set of service structure and content templates.  Axios also offer a service catalog strategy workshop to jump start the process.  Axios are the worlds leading “independent” software provider.  Martin advised that the key word is independent and that Axios stick to their knitting which is to invest in their Assyst product suite.  

HP Cloud Service Catalog (Beta) ” Project Coral” –  effectively manage the service portfolio based on cost, quality of service and user feedback 

IBM CloudBurst – Automate service delivery and help save operating costs through a self-service portal and service catalog

BMC – Enable all areas of your business with a consistent, accurate view of IT services with BMC Software’s Service Catalog

Newscale acquired by Cisco – Publish a menu of standardized service offerings in an online catalog.  Newscale technology will serve as the storefront for [Cisco] Cloud services with its Amazon-like interface

A key point to remember is that the Service Catalogue solution of service offerings to the Business  should not include Service Request Fulfillment.  For example you cannot request a new service via a tool rather it is an informed discussion with the Business Relationship Manager.  If a user wants to order something in particular, then they will typically use a different best of breed solution e.g. Ariba.  So don’t dilute the value of the Service Catalog. 

The Vendors will respond that in a world of Cloud Based Services a user should be able to self-provision.  That is fine as an argument if you are talking about technical components in a virtualised “On Demand” world.  How many organisations are there yet?  The school answer is that Service Requests are part of the Service Desk solution, they are not required functionality of the Service Catalog.

Business Services Catalog – the Evolution

http://www.slideshare.net/servicenowdotcom/knowledge11business-services-catalog-the-evolution

Samantha Reed has produced this presentation on the evolution of the Business Services catalog.  On slide 5 and 7 the Technical Services Catalog is shown.  As we move more of these capabilities and resources to 3rd Party Service Providers we will only need to capture information at the level of Service Assets not drill down into the detail of configuration items because the CMDB will be managed externally.   

2 Comments

Filed under Business

Cloud Enabled Service Catalogs

The IBM Cloud Reference Architecture sets out the Cloud Service Consumer on the left, the Cloud Service Provider and finally the Cloud Service Developer.  Within the Common Cloud Platform the Service Offering Catalog (highlighted in black) sits in the Business Support Services domain which is separate to the Saas, PaaS, IaaS Cloud Services.

IBM acquired Cast Iron Systems, a leading Software as a Service (SaaS) cloud application integration provider.  Websphere Cast Iron integrates Packaged applications, Home Grown applications and CloudBurst.  CloudBurst provides pre-installed, fully integrated service management capabilities across hardware, middleware and applications.  This includes the Service Catalog which effectively is a list of pre-engineered services from which Developers can choose. 

The IBM SmartCloud offering shows the five different cloud service configurations from Private to Managed Private to Hosted Private to Shared Cloud Services and finally Public Cloud Services.  The Service Catalog definition for these five Cloud Service  configurations will be different because the respective Service Assets (Capabilities and Resources) together with component parts of the Service Value Chain will vary according to requirements. This is because Service Integration and Interoperability becomes critical to achieving true benefits of cloud. 

What the business wants is a single “pane of glass” storefront with a scalable Service Catalog

Through 2015, cloud services brokerage will represent the single largest revenue growth opportunity in cloud computing! (Gartner)

  1. By 2015, at least 20% of all cloud services will be handled via brokers, rather than directly—up from less than 5% today. (Gartner)
  2. Through 2014, cloud service brokerage will generate more than $5 billion in sales—up from less than $50 million this year—making it the fastest growing area of cloud computing. (Gartner)
  3. By 2015, 50% of new outsourcing deals will be significantly Cloud enabled.  (Saugatuck)
  4. Technology platforms (enabled by Cloud IT) have emerged as the newest value lever for services leadership and adoption will continue in 2011 at a rapid pace. (Saugatuck)

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

Projects fail because the required People Change is not managed

The Standish Group was formed in 1985 and is based in Boston [MA].  The Standish Group is the recognised leader in analysing project and value performance.  Information on real-life IT [IS] failures is collated in order to assess a specific project against a database of cases and specific criteria (CHAOS 10 Success Factors).  The CHAOS Report monitors the % of projects that are:

  • Successful (completed On Time and On Budget with required Features and Functions),
  • Challenged (Late with Budget Overruns) and
  • Failed (Cancelled before Completion or Delivered and Never Used)

It is important to note that the Standish Group Methodology has been questioned of late.  There are concerns regarding the underlying data and measurement methods used as the basis of the study on IT project failures. The CHAOS data and methods of measurement are not available for verification. Without having the opportunity to examine the statistical aggregate data, we should acknowledge that the CHAOS report findings shown in the table below are their own independent benchmark:

These findings show that the percentage of Failed Projects is at the same level as 10 years ago.

In this period there has been significant investment in updating Programme and Project Management methods [Processes] and tools [Technology].

So why are projects still failing?

Projects fail because people aren’t bought in to the objectives and outcomes.

We communicate too many critical details verbally—Studies have shown that oral communication (speaking) is not only the most-often used form of communication, but it is also the least memorable. People remember only 10% of what they hear on average versus 20% of what they read and 80% of what they see.

How Much Do People Remember?

We only tell them “what they need to know” which often isn’t enough – Project Managers tell their team members only “what we think they need to know” but all too often we don’t know what they need to know.

We don’t properly explain the business objectives behind the projects – Team buy-in is important; if your team doesn’t understand how their work advances the business’ objectives then the chances that they might do something counter-productive increase.

So the main focus for this weeks posts are that you need to attend to People Matters if you want your project to be Successful.

Read on for insight and interventions that will help you to deliver Transformational Change.


Leave a comment

Filed under Business

The Four Factors that determine the outcome of any People Change project

The Hard Side of Change Management by Sirkin, Keenan and Jackson.  HBR

Companies must pay as much attention to the hard side of change management as they do to the soft aspects. By rigorously focusing on four critical elements, they can stack the odds in favor of success.

D. The duration of time until the change program is completed if it has a short lifespan; if not short, the amount of time between reviews of milestones.
I. The project team’s performance integrity; that is, its ability to complete the initiative on time. That depends on members’ skills and traits relative to the project’s requirements.
C. The commitment to change that top management (C1) and employees affected by the change (C2) display.
E. The effort over and above the usual work that the change initiative demands of employees.

Duration – Do formal project reviews occur regularly? If the project will take more than two months to complete, what is the average time between reviews?

Integrity of Performance – Is the team leader capable? How strong are team members’ skills and motivations? Do they have sufficient time to spend on the change initiative?

Senior Executive and Local Commitment – Do senior executives regularly communicate the reason for the change and the importance of its success? Is the message convincing? Is the message consistent, both across the top management team and over time? Has top management devoted enough resources to the change program?

Effort – What is the percentage of increased effort that employees must make to implement the change effort? Does the incremental effort come on top of a heavy
workload? Have people strongly resisted the increased demands on them?

Putting Employees First – Vineet Nayar, CEO of HCL Technologies, Ltd.

Explains how by taking unconvential steps, for example by inverting the management pyramid and reverse accountability, leads to superior organizational performance.

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

Enabling people to perform the right activities in the right way

An ancient oriental proverb states:

He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not, is a fool – shun him, (= Unconsciously Ineffective)
He who knows not, and knows that he knows not is ignorant – teach him, (= Consciously Ineffective)
He who knows, and knows not that he knows, is asleep – wake him, (= Unconsciously Effective)
But he who knows, and knows that he knows, is a wise man – follow him. (= Consciously Effective)

These four stages of ineffectiveness / effectiveness are illustrated in the above diagram.  Firstly the Team Lead must recognise that some team members have become DFH (Dumb, Fat & Happy) and that intervention is required.  There is then a risk that people will choose to move into the Sulk Corner.  Implementation steps are about keeping instructions clear, concise, consistent and simple (change a few key things first).  Transformational change is the point where you realise that it requires significant effort to return to previous ways of working.  Practice is the best way to move from this state. This means that the new behaviours are self-sustaining.

Modern thinking is that the desired state is to be unconciously effective but look out for complacency as people become less effective in performing stale processes.  Processes are like ice they melt away over time so ensure that process outcomes are reviewed at least every quarter.  Feedback and benchmarking will provide a good quality of metrics to help the organisation, team or individual to diagnose where improvement is required.

Overcoming Resistance To Change

[youtube http://youtu.be/hcz1aZ60k7w]

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

The Impact of Change: The Human Side

Dr. John Kotter asks how many people are going to be affected by this change.  One Senior Executive stated 500 staff would need to change their behaviour when in fact the real answer was 5,000.  The Human Side of change is always under estimated.

Alert iconDr. Kotter talks about how to win over both hearts and minds in his book The Heart of Change. Within Dr Kotter’s 8 Step Process winning hearts and minds is an important part of business thinking and a way to change behaviour in an organizational or a cultural change.  How do you get to change the way people think?  Getting to the business heart is something that many people miss.
Stephen R. Covey discusses the Five Emotional Cancers – Criticizing, Complaining, Comparing, Competing and Contending
…and the fact that the majority of the workforce are performing well within their capabilities and feel disempowered with no voice.

The 90 / 10 Principle

The 90/10 Principle teaches that only 10% of the things that happen in our lives are out of our control, the rest, is in our control. We can choose how to respond or react.

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

5 Ways Cloud Computing will impact Internal Service Providers

Every day, it seems, businesses are making new cloud applications available.  For example Apple launched their iCloud service on 13th October.  The  Internet Exchange Point in London, a conduit for much of the UK’s Internet traffic, showed a significant spike between 6pm and 11pm.

  Apple has built iCloud support right into iOS 5, OS X 10.7 Lion, and other major Apple apps. Sign in, and iCloud transparently takes care of syncing music, video, pictures, email, calendars, contacts, and more between devices.  iCloud stores customers content and wirelessly pushes it to all their devices.

In this example Apple has a direct relationship with the consumer of their services and has obviated the need for an Internal Service Provider.

So what impact is Cloud Computing likely to have on Internal Service Providers:

Internal Service Provider Support Staff typically focus on technical / platform skills. – In the future, the support staff will most likely be outsourced to a company that can provide services more efficiently by using proven technology solutions and through economies of scale.  New Retained Orgnisation capabilities will be required which will result in fewer but more senior hybrid (Business & Technology) roles.

Today’s ISPs build and manage their own Service Assets. –In the future, these Service Assets will be remote (in the cloud). The ISP will likely not be building or maintaining their own infrastructure, platforms or non strategic (KTLO) applications. In the future ISPs will only be responsible for the Strategic Applications that differentiate their Business in the market.  Typically IaaS, PaaS, SaaS and BPaaS will be outsourced.  (AKA the Goldman Sachs model).

Portfolio & Project management. – IS-related implementations of software and new technology will be outsourced. The Internal Service Provider will be responsible for Portfolio and Project Management. There will be a requirement for staff with strong Governance (ISACA CobIT 5) backgrounds who are empowered to make informed investment portfolio decisions.

Unified Communications. – Internal Service Providers wil need to work with their TelCo(s) to implement real-time collaboration services such as IM (chat), IP telephony, Webinars, video conferencing that is also integrated with unified messaging (voicemail, Email, SMS and Scan to Email).  With the increase of Mobility Services (Tablet and SmartPhone) these services must be ubiquitous (always on).

Trusted Business Advisor. – In the future Business Partners / Business Relationship Managers will act as trusted advisors to their respective Business Unit Buyers of Services and Customer Groups.  They will present ideas on how Information Services can be exploited by the Business rather than purely serve as order takers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

Crisis (Mis)Management : the CrackBerry has become the CrapBerry

In Feb 2005 a component of the BlackBerry network infrastructure experienced a service interruption which impacted all users.  In 2007 a BlackBerry service outage impacted 5 million customers and RIM were perceived to have poor crisis management.  Al Sacco has collated a timeline of this and other major BlackBerry outages for period 2007-2009.  In conclusion, there have been several warnings about the health of the RIM network infrastructure which have not been dealt with effectively by the Senior Leadership Team.

“Wireless communication has gone from a travel convenience to a mission critical communications tool” – Randall De Lorenzo

RIM operates its own data network, including four Network Operations Centres (NOCs) for its wireless email system: two in Waterloo, Ontario (one for North America, one for South America), one in the UK (Slough) for Europe, the Middle East and Africa and one for the Asia Pacific region. All Blackberry data traffic passes through one of these centres.

The official statement reported that RIM experienced a core switch [hardware] failure.  However there is chatter, reputably from a RIM insider, that a software upgrade was applied in the Slough NOC on Monday.  The real point of failure appears to be a fundamental piece of RIM’s own software called the “Relay” which directs traffic within each of the four NOCs.

“I actually think the Relay has reached melting point and, err, melted,” the former RIM staffer said.

To compound matters the RIM Egham (Surrey) data centre’s Oracle database, a bespoke and heavy-duty communications data storage application, was corrupted. This database is effectively the “brain” of the BlackBerry Internet Service, handling messages and forwarding data to users.  With saving the Oracle database the top priority, RIM was forced to repair software while it was still running – a difficult and fraught process known as a “hotfix”.

“Working with a live database like that is the stuff of nightmares,” explained one network engineer.

This database corruption problem, according to industry sources, is thought to be the reason the outage lasted well into Thursday for many users.

Mike Lazaridis – (Co CEO) posted this message “To all our Customers”.  The message backlog has been relieved with service finally back to normal.

[youtube http://youtu.be/zQ1esvGae_s]

RIM’s proprietary network architecture enables BBM messaging and data carriage with high efficiency, encryption and offloads carrier bandwidth.  By operating its own network, RIM was able to provide a highly secure encrypted and reliable service when the company had a relatively small number of subscribers, but some telecom experts suggest it is difficult to scale up such a network to handle the traffic generated by 70m subscribers. Insiders say RIM’s management is aware of these problems (no need to encrypt video messages) and has been considering ways to address them.

Apologising for interruptions and delays, RIM’s chief information officer, Robin Bienfait, previously said on the company’s website: “You’ve depended on us for reliable, real-time communications, and right now we’re letting you down. We are taking this very seriously and have people around the world working around the clock to address this situation.

On Wednesday it emerged that an intermittent service outage preventing users accessing email had spread to 30m-40m people, half of all Blackberry subscribers worldwide.  David Yach, RIM’s chief technology officer for software, said that RIM had to restrict service everywhere due to a backlog of undelivered messages.  “Blackberry Jam” bottleneck?

For some users, everything has come to a standstill. For others e-mail works but BlackBerry Messenger is down. For yet others, e-mail comes in bursts every few hours and outgoing e-mails don’t go from the device.

Telecoms analyst Dean Bubley said the problem could lie in the way RIM “siphons off” all internet traffic to and from BlackBerry handsets for optimisation purposes, without allowing fallback to normal internet peering points in the event of RIM’s systems going down.

“RIM routes all data traffic via its servers and network infrastructure, [creating a] single point of failure,” Bubley told ZDNet UK. “It does lots of good things — it compresses data a lot, adds security, manages email connections, [enables] BBM and so on — but it also routes the ‘vanilla’ web traffic through that path as well.”

“It is sad to say, but it is almost impossible to deny: the CrackBerry has become the CrapBerry” Jon C. Ogg

Users are venting their “outage outrage” on Twitter and in the blogosphere. Many are reaching the same conclusion: this is a communications crisis for Research in Motion.

Crisis Management

RIM you’d expect round-the-clock crisis management, constant, helpful communication and swift resolution. However, RIM appears to be pursuing a textbook version of how not to respond in a crisis situation.

The Ten Golden Rules of Crisis Communication

[youtube http://youtu.be/qM7liob6DPs]

PAS 200:2011 is the new Publicly Available Specification standard for Crisis Management and was officially launched on 29th September 2011.  The standard is designed to help organizations take practical steps to improve their ability to deal with crises. 

Developed by leading crisis management experts, PAS 200 provides users with a framework that delivers the practical steps to identify potential crises, mitigate the risks and avoid potentially damaging [reputational] consequences.

Section 6 of PAS 200 provides guidance on how to Communicate in a crisis

6.1 General

6.2 Communications strategy

6.3 Formal and informal communications structures

6.4 Planning to communicate

6.5 Methods of communication

6.6 Barriers to effective communication

A lack of immediate response leads to a vacuum, which is almost always filled, with negative perception and commentary. It would seem that there have been no lessons learned by RIM management from previous outages.

The RIM blog – BlackBerry Help – would be an ideal medium through which to keep users informed. As of 11am Wednesday there was no mention on the Help blog of the near-total failure of its services across a significant percentage of the globe.

RIM Management definitely need to revisit their Crisis Management Plan (Red Book).  The Crisis Management Plan is typically hosted in a private cloud to make it available from anywhere in the world to an authorised member of the Crisis Management Team.

Market Woes

All this comes at a precarious time for RIM’s management. The company is losing market share to Apple’s iOS and the Google’s Android system (down from 19% to 12% a year earlier).  In the quarter ending in August its revenues were 10% lower than a year before at $4.2 billion and profits were down by more than half.  This chart plots the RIMM share price for the last 12 months (source FT.com Market Data).  RIMM share price closed the week at $23.97 from a peak of $70.54 in Feb 2011.

Research In Motion Ltd RIMM:NSQ
Moreover, the merchant bank Jaguar Financial, an investor in the Canadian firm, is campaigning to have RIM broken up or sold off.  According to Reuters, Jaguar, wants co-chief executives Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis out.  By having co-CEOs it is difficult to clarify ownership in order to identify the “single throat to choke”.  Jaguar said on Tuesday that it has the support of eight percent of RIM’s shareholders for its plans – enough to demand a shareholders’ meeting about the matter.  This choice may be taken away from the Senior Executives if the market intrinsically believes that there is more shareholder value if RIM is broken up.

Service Strategy

So what is the revised RIM Service Strategy?  Should RIM ditch its proprietary network making use of best of breed carriers instead,  This shift in direction will enable Senior Management to concentrate on Mobile (7 OS) and Playbook tablet software (QNX) as well as shifting new hardware devices.

Competing Service Offering

RIM’s claims of providing an enterprise-class service are quite hollow given the known single points of failure in their network design and number of service outages in recent years. How about you seriously consider the encrypted “iMessage” service from the fruit based company as a replacement for BlackBerry Messenger (BBM).  What did the iPhone say to the BlackBerry – iWork.

RBS trial of iPhone poses new threat to BlackBerry.  UK bank is the latest to test Apple smartphone’s suitability for confidential corporate communications following the large-scale BlackBerry shutdown last week.

By managing this crisis differently Jim and Mike could have mitigated the risk to the RIM brand and reputation.  For a company that is providing a secure trusted service they have ignored this promise to their customers. It may be perceived that the RIM leadership are more interested in Technology given that Mike is an engineer by background rather than grounded in Service Principles.  Lets see what happens to the [reputedly loyal] customer base as a result of not providing Service Utility and Warranty.

Service Improvement Action

Taking guidance from the new PAS 200:2001 and having a defined Crisis Management Team and Plan with clear role accountabilities is a must have because there will definitely be another network service outage (at least one per year since 2007, and the expected increase in customers in emerging markets will put further strain on the four NOCs).

How well will RIM respond next time it happens and will it be a tipping point for their loyal CrackBerry customers?

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

“Smart” Service Management

So the IBM share price peaked to an all time high this week.  On Friday, International Business Machines Corp (IBM:NYQ) closed at $190.53.  This reflects an increase of 32% in the last 12 months.

IBM is a sales organisation and Global Services is responsible for over 50 percent of IBM’s total revenue.  So it would appear that IBM is doing the right things for all key stakeholders. Global Business Services (AM etc.) and Global Technology Services (infrastructure on demand etc.) are their two market facing divisions.

Thomas Watson implemented “generous sales incentives, a focus on customer service and an insistence on well-groomed, dark-suited salesmen”.

The Client Solutions (Sales) Executive is typically a trusted advisor who understands client needs and shapes the solution to meet these perceived needs.  The CSE is allocated a % of the Total Contract Value as a bonus.  The CSE also dictates the amount of bonus paid to each of the defined names in their team.  As you can imagine by taking this approach the team is highly motivated to win.  However, it is important to note that if the deal goes bad within 2 years the CSE must repay their bonus amount.

In contrast, the IBM Delivery Executive and Service Delivery Manager manage to the letter of the contract and typically act in a transactional manner.  There is little partnering with the retained client organisation or desire to work collaboratively with other service providers. In my experience IBM refuse to take ownership for incidents, fail to investigate or resolve problems and are not pro-active. It is a well known fact that IBM hide behind the Statement of Work which is used as a delaying tactic for the smallest enhancement request.

Moreover, I understand that Global Technology Services has been put on “Notice to Cure” in some cases in the US, or has failed to live up to promises made during the solution sales process.  There is a serious expectation gap between clients and their IBM [Technology Services] delivery teams.  So what is really going on out there? This state of affairs is not a sustainable position for Global Services now or in the future.

If you Google IBM Service Management you will be directed to IT Solutions – Operations and Service Management where the focus is on Tooling (Netcool, Tivoli etc.)

Whilst Technology plays an important part in delivering predictable services it is much more about People and the Processes that they perform.

IBM allegedly claim to have shaped ITIL 1.0.  If this is indeed the case I would like to know why they have not maintained their thought leadership in all things related to excellence in Service Management practices.

Listed below are IBM entities which are certified to the International Standard for demonstrating excellence in Service Management

I wonder how many US and European outsourcing contracts are ISO/IEC 20000 certified given that only the Ministry of Defence in the UK and IBM Ltd in France are in the above list.
Furthermore, it is not clear to me how IBM Technology Services Delivery Executives are incentivised to succeed. Some clients definitely will not renew their infrastructure outsourcing contracts given the lack of response from IBM to their changing business needs.  As a minimum IBM should shift their service strategy from just doing the basics to creating demonstrable value through providing world class information services.
Advertorial suggesting that working smarter is all about having IBM assets (tools) deployed across your IT estate.  What about people, culture, values and generally accepted good Service Management practices?

It would be very helpful if IBM ate its own dog food and created aSmarter” Service Management capability that is not totally dependent on tools.

Ivor MacFarlane  was recruited by IBM, following the ITILv3 update, to help build a “Smarter” Service Management capability.  Ivor knows what good looks like.

Here is Ivor running an IBM Service Management Simulator session

Good luck Ivor in getting the IBM “Integrated” Service Management mantra [around tools] shifted to different messaging around the principles of Service Management excellence.

I have direct experience of two IBM AAA Business Partners in the UK who know what good “Service Management Practices” look like, namely PIREAN [Tivoli Enterprise IT Service Management] and Simon and Jason at ORB DATA.  To be clear these two partners sometimes confuse Tivoli Enterprise Systems Management with Service Management Practices.

doing the right things is more important than doing things right.

To recap “Smart” Service Management is all about embedding the right service focus into an established technology platform / skill based organisation.  “Service Matters” around here was a slogan that was used to good effect in order to get this message across.  At another client the top down message was that we have a”Zero Tolerance of Failure” not in a blame culture sort of way but in a collaborative let’s prevent this from happening again on our watch.

So in conclusion my exam questions is the following:  To what extent can your Service Provider predict the warranty and utility of their service: measured by the number of consecutive “Green Days” for service KPIs?

Service Providers who are able to deliver predictable Business outcomes sound much more “Smart” to me.

Leave a comment

Filed under Business

Which conference will YOU be attending?

I received an email from Danielle @ itSMF this week informing me that there is only four weeks to go until the UK Annual Conference.

There are 10 reasons listed why you should attend:

  1. Best practice guidance, delivered by service management experts at just the right level (Good or Leading practices not Best)
  2. Learning from industry leaders
  3. Inspirational keynotes
  4. Doing more with less
  5. New solutions to familiar problems
  6. Gaining hands-on experience – join one of our experiential learning or simulation workshops, essentially a “game environment” for learning
  7. Catching up with industry developments – Exhibition, showcasing the latest products and services from around 50 service management software, training and consultancy organisations
  8. Being part of an international community
  9. Recognising industry achievements.
  10. Two days, one roof

Conference package prices range from £369 to £1249 exclusive of VAT, while a one day pass to the Exhibition at only £35 plus VAT is excellent value and will enable you to meet Barclay Rae and some of his ITSMtv colleagues.

Unlike previous events, there does not seem to be an overall theme for the itSMF UK conference this year.

In August, I had a conversation with the COO of the company who are on stand E9 in the Exhibition Hall.  In this meeting, we discussed the use of Telestrations as a delivery method to increase the number of eyes that are able to view their eLearning and classroom based training content.  Here is an example of a Telestration:

So the choice is a simple one.  To what extent do you need to attend in person or is it possible to access some of the presentation materials and vendor sales [exhibits] on the Web?

Gartner Symposium IT Xpo (Barcelona 07-10 November)

It is important to note that the Gartner Symposium IT Xpo is being held at the same time as the itSMF UK Annual Conference.  The Symposium ITxpo is about Re-imagine IT : Leading from the Front and Gartner promote the conference in the following way.  These two video clips were created to promote the US (Orlando, FL) conference taking place from 16-20 October.  It is also possible to access the Orlando conference live blog to get a flavour of what good looks like.

Gartner also share a detailed preview of the various tracks.  Here is an example of the Applications Track.

Finally Gartner  make it easier to justify your attendance by providing you with a Justification Toolkit which includes a customisible letter to your manager and a trip report.  They also send out a post event brief.

16th Annual International IT Service Management Conference & Exhibition – “Pink 12”

Given that you may have waited until now to book your place at the itSMF UK Annual conference why not use your budget to attend Pink 12 in Las Vegas – the 16th Annual International IT Service Management Conference & Exhibition (19-22 February 2012).

The Pink 12 conference theme is about “Knowledge Translated Into Results“, showing you how to go beyond just theory to achieve true business value and outcomes

The Last Early Bird Offer is only valid if you register and pay by October 28, 2011:

  • Save over $500! on a Regular Pass: $1,995 – plus stay at the world famous Bellagio Hotel for only $99.00 a night (maximum 3 nights – February 19, 20, 21)

Pink11 opened with this thought-provoking video: is IT ready?

I’ll leave it up to you to decide which conference to attend

should I stay or should I go” [The Clash]

Leave a comment

Filed under Business